Students should work in pairs/small groups to study the table and answer the prompt question.


Comments:

Alcoholic drinks and tobacco appear to be inferior between 1970 and 2008, but in reality demand is probably falling as a result of other factors rather than income. Other categories, however, probably do say something about income elasticity, with food, housing and recreation behaving like we might expect.

Table 6.3 Volume of household expenditure: by purpose United Kingdom

Index numbers (1970=100)
1970 1981 1991 2001 2008 2013
Food and non-alcoholic drinks 100 105 117 137 149 142
Clothing and footwear 100 122 190 350 520 670
Housing, water and fuel 100 118 141 154 163 171
Household goods and services 100 122 167 274 300 273
Health 100 126 185 191 233 221
Transport 100 142 200 273 325 304
Communication 100 191 308 795 1,132 1,073
Recreation and culture 100 169 298 581 930 961
Education 100 162 202 258 231 199
Restaurants and hotels 100 132 175 202 211 194
National income 100 125 174 240 284 278
Question 1

What happened to national income between 1970 and 2008? What about between 2008 and 2013?

Question 2

Given that:

a. Which goods seem to be income elastic and inelastic?

b. Which goods seem to have postive and negative YED?

c. Pick three goods and try to explain why this might be.

Question 3

Look at the index numbers:

a. Why are they all ‘100’ in 1970?

b. What do the numbers therefore mean in later years?

Have students read the two news stories and consider the following

  1. 1) Whether YED appears to +ve or –ve (+ve for travel, -ve for Dominos pizzas apparently).
  2. 2) How elastic YED seems to be (more than/less than proportional)
  3. 3) How much of the change is in reality down to the recession and how much is down to other factors (eg the advertising campaign that Dominos undertook)

Click on a news item to read

Article 1

Article 2